I had a chance to see Prince Caspian this week, and I’ve got to say that if you haven’t seen the movie yet and you’re hoping for another movie that is a close adaptation of the book like The Lion, The Witch and The Wardrobe was, you’ll be a bit dissapointed. The movie makers have taken significant liberties both with the story and with the characters. From a movie perspective I can understand taking some liberties to make a better movie, however, I think they went too far.
Now let’s be honest here for a second: Prince Caspian, as it is written by C.S. Lewis would not make the best movie when compared to others in the Narnia series. There isn’t a ton of action, and the main characters are all rather one-dimensional. That being said, Caspian is still a good story, and I think the movie makers could have stuck to the source material a bit more closely and still made a very good movie. I don’t want to give away too much of the movie, so let me give you one example of how sticking to the source material was done well yet still changed things up to make a better movie, and another example of how a new scene was written that, I felt, took away from the movie.
First is the scene with the White Witch. No, I won’t say more than that, except that all this scene does is take one chapter from the book and gives a sort of “what if” senario, that takes the chapter one step further. The movie makers simply expand on something in the book. They don’t write much new or change the characters. I thought this scene was well done, and made for a better movie.
Second is a scene where Peter, Caspian and their troops storm the castle in order to take an early win in the battle for Narnia. Check the book, this scene isn’t there. I understand the need to make a bit more action for the movie, but this scene doesn’t just do that it changes the characters as well. It makes Peter and Caspian to be young men out for glory and honor, rather than the noble and heroic figures they are in the book. It’s a shame really, because if they wanted to add more action there is a skirmish between the men and the dwarves + Caspian that is referred to in the book they could have expanded on. It may not have been as grand as this scene, but it would have stuck closer to the source material.
This scene, for as much as I didn’t like it, did make Peter and Caspian a bit more dynamic than they are portrayed in the book. However, I felt there were some scenes from the book that were skipped in the movie that would have had a similar, if not as dramatic effect. My favorite is the scene where Lucy sees Aslan for the second time (that part is in the movie in the form of a dream), and she then convinces her siblings to follow her, as she follows Aslan, even though they can’t see Aslan. It’s a beautiful scene that portrays Lucy’s faith, and her siblings faith in her. It also beautifully displays the conflict of faith and doubt that Peter, Susan and Edmund have as they wonder why they can not see Aslan, and one by one come to terms with their doubt and as a result can see Aslan themselves, the theme is still in the movie, but I don’t think the added scenes come close to capturing the simple power this scene had.
Still, with all my frustrations about the movie, seeing Reepicheep with his little sword and feather on the big screen almost makes up for the liberties the movie makers took.
In the end, it’s still a good movie, but not as good as TLTWATW. Allow the movie makers to have their creative way with the story and you’ll enjoy it a lot more.
I only hope that they don’t mess with the next one as much, as The Voyage of the Dawn Treader is my favorite book in the Narnia series.